Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 19:03:35 01/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 1999 at 14:44:45, Matt Frank wrote: >I am happy to see your comments. I too, agree that the SSDF tries to be a >rigorous as possible in their comparisons. I would bet that some of the sour >grapes we read about, come from disgruntled purchasers of chess playing software >that does not get rated as highly as they had hoped. > >Matt Frank Not sour grapes on my part, whats the point when Rebel 10 or CM6K are not even on the list, we all know why this is. Until you can include all programs and play them on equal hardware, then the SSDF is nothing more than a joke.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.