Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 20:19:19 01/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 1999 at 22:03:35, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >On January 29, 1999 at 14:44:45, Matt Frank wrote: > >>I am happy to see your comments. I too, agree that the SSDF tries to be a >>rigorous as possible in their comparisons. I would bet that some of the sour >>grapes we read about, come from disgruntled purchasers of chess playing software >>that does not get rated as highly as they had hoped. >> >>Matt Frank > >Not sour grapes on my part, whats the point when Rebel 10 or CM6K are not even >on the list, we all know why this is. Until you can include all programs and >play them on equal hardware, then the SSDF is nothing more than a joke. Who gets to make the rules? Those programs do not have autoplayers. The Rebel company *specifically asked* _not_ to be included in the list. If you want to test hundreds of CM6000 games manually, I will guarantee you that the SSDF will be happy to accept them from you. Are you up to it?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.