Author: Brian Kostick
Date: 10:31:37 03/08/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 08, 2005 at 10:07:50, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>Deep Sjeng not in the list,Kurt? >>You dont include Chessmaster 9000 SKR settings to check if Chessmaster 9000 is >>better than Chessmaster 10000? > > > As I mentioned in my previous post: we have taken > Deep Sjeng 1.6 out from our tournament (very bad > result of 4.0/14) and replaced it by The King 3.33 > Yoda 2.5 settings. Due to the very long lasting > tourney (840 games !!) we can't have more than > eight (8) engines in this tournament. And it is > also our principle to never let play old vs new > version of the same program. Hence CM9_SKR or > our so far best setting CM9_T05 is not allowed > to run in this tournament. I think people are > more interested in results of the latest version > (CM10k) of Johan de Koning's engine. > Kurt Kurt and company, Glad to see your new tournament. I agree on scrapping the old vs new versions idea, or even new vs new settings (CMxx), although sometimes there are exceptions. Things get very murky when we see five chessmaster settings, three shredder version, four fritz engines... Also glad to see a return to own books, even though I occasionally enjoy a same book tournament. Nice to see a test other than fast blitz as well. Thanks, Brian
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.