Author: KarinsDad
Date: 22:05:55 01/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 1999 at 00:20:52, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 29, 1999 at 23:53:38, KarinsDad wrote: > >>On January 29, 1999 at 22:34:54, robert flint wrote: >> >>>i would has anyone forgotten that fritz3 destroyed deep thought !!!! this should >>>be proof alone i agree with matt frank he has a good arguement. brute for means >>>nothing it is the qaulity of the program that matters. take a class c player let >>>him look at a difficult mate in say 7moves. give this player 5 hours to look at >>>the position he may never solve it!!!!! now let a grandmaster with years of >>>expierence look at it for a few minutes and he'll most surely win the win! my >>>point is that knowledge will alway overcome brute for!!! >> >>Destroyed? Could you please tell me when that was? Did it just win a tournament >>or did it get crushed in a match? Please provide details (I'm sketchy on stuff >>from years ago). >Dateline 1995: >Fritz wins the Computer Chess World Championship in Hongkong on a P90, beating >the two fastest parallel machines in the tournament with Black: Deep Thought and >Star Socrates. > >Pretty historic, because a micro won the open computer chess championship. >Now that Deep Blue is counting beans for somebody, it could happen again. Ok, I was able to find that Fritz3 won the tournament 5-1. Does anyone have the crosstable for the games? It doesn't seem that a 5-1 victory in one tournament is destroying, but I guess others will disagree since Fritz3 was on a micro whereas Deep Thought and Star Socrates were on MP machines. KarinsDad
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.