Author: James T. Walker
Date: 04:07:26 03/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 08, 2005 at 16:35:44, Olaf Jenkner wrote: > 1.Le4-d3 Be5-e4 2.Ld3-e4 Be6-e5 3.Le4-d3 Be5-e4 4.Ld3-e4 Se8-d6 5.Le4-d3 >Sd6-e4 6.Ld3-e4 Sg8-f6 > 7.Le4-d3 Sf6-e4 8.Ld3-e4 La6-b7 9.Le4-d3 Lb7-e4 10.Tb4-b5 Td8-d5 11.Tb5-d5 >Dh6-d6 12.Sf7-d6 Kf4-g5 >13.Sd2-e4 Kg5-h5 14.Se4-f6 Be7-f6 15.Ld3-e4 Ta8-g8 16.Le4-f3 Tg8-g4 >17.Lf3-g4/Bh3-g4# > >OJe Hello Olaf, Since you claim it's a mate in 17 instead of 19 something is wrong somewhere! Chest says it's mate in 19 and the first deviation from Chest in your line is 4....Nd6? Since this leads to a mate in 17 how can it be considered optimal? Can you prove that Chest 4....e5 is not optimal? Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.