Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 06:31:27 03/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 08, 2005 at 23:41:27, Joshua Haglund wrote:
>On March 08, 2005 at 20:05:14, Jason Kent wrote:
>
>>On March 08, 2005 at 11:04:40, Joshua Haglund wrote:
>>
>>>Some results at Playchess.com
>>># Engine N Games Elo Range Rank
>>>
>>>fruit 2.0 26191 2534 ±31 15.
>>>pro deo 1.1 5004 2481 n/a 65.
>>>ruffian 1.0.5 11097 2481 ±21 66.
>>>aristarch 4.50 12941 2470 ±8 70.
>>>pro deo 1.0 19510 2461 ±11 72.
>>>aristarch 4.41 3269 2445 n/a n/a
>>>list 512 9474 2438 ±5 79.
>>>ruffian 1.0.1 3381 2427 n/a 82.
>>>list 504 2936 2390 n/a 96.
>>>
>>>Fruit 2.0 is my pick :)
>>>
>>>Joshua Haglund
>>>toneewa@yahoo.com
>>
>>This is a good example of showing how the playchess stats you use are flawed. :)
>> Fruit 2.0 while being probably the best open-source, is not even in the top 3
>>freeware engines on most lists and testing i have seen.
>
>Could you post some links. :P
>Thanks for your thoughts :)
>
>Joshua Haglund
>toneewa@yahoo.com
Fruit 2.0 is good placed in the following list:
http://www.computerschach.com/rangliste/english/
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.