Author: Micheal Cummings
Date: 02:44:14 01/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 1999 at 23:19:19, Dann Corbit wrote: >On January 29, 1999 at 22:03:35, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >> >>On January 29, 1999 at 14:44:45, Matt Frank wrote: >> >>>I am happy to see your comments. I too, agree that the SSDF tries to be a >>>rigorous as possible in their comparisons. I would bet that some of the sour >>>grapes we read about, come from disgruntled purchasers of chess playing software >>>that does not get rated as highly as they had hoped. >>> >>>Matt Frank >> >>Not sour grapes on my part, whats the point when Rebel 10 or CM6K are not even >>on the list, we all know why this is. Until you can include all programs and >>play them on equal hardware, then the SSDF is nothing more than a joke. >Who gets to make the rules? Those programs do not have autoplayers. The Rebel >company *specifically asked* _not_ to be included in the list. If you want to >test hundreds of CM6000 games manually, I will guarantee you that the SSDF will >be happy to accept them from you. Are you up to it? As I said we know why these programs were not included. And no I would not want to play these games, apart from not having the time, I could not be bothered. That still does not change the fact that this list is only half done, and pointless in my view.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.