Author: Terry Giles
Date: 10:57:24 03/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 08, 2005 at 19:24:08, George Tsavdaris wrote: > > Robert Fischer in my opinion can be easily compared with Kasparov, speaking >about total dominance or quality and strength of playing........Too tough to >make the call of who is better........... >And we can't know what will happen if the invincible Capablanca would have lived >in the 50's..... He perhaps was the best........ Hi George, I wouldn't compare their careers though, just their chess strength. After all Kasparov has been the world's No.1 player for some 20 years now. He has also defended his world title many times (Fischer never did). He has maintained his 2800+ elo rating for 20 years. Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.