Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is it time for the Winboard Protocol to go the way of the Dodo?

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 11:36:18 03/09/05

Go up one level in this thread


On March 09, 2005 at 14:20:34, Andrew Williams wrote:

>On March 09, 2005 at 12:13:26, Anthony Cozzie wrote:
>
>>After the post on how Daniel Mehrmann is still working on XBoard/Winboard, I
>>immediately starting thinking of ways to waste his time.  My question is: Does
>>Winboard really have any advantages over UCI any more?
>>
>>The Anthony WB/UCI comparison:
>>
>>+UCI:
>>
>>Interface is cleaner & easier to implement, not being based on the crappy GNU
>>chess protocol.
>>
>>Supports Multiple PVs, refutations, etc.
>>
>>Graphical configuration of engines.
>>
>>+WinBoard:
>>
>>Can operate in text mode.
>>
>>And this comparison is (obviously) quite favorable to UCI, although I may have
>>missed things.  Anyway, I'd be willing to help Daniel out over the next few
>>weeks if it meant a new version of Xboard with UCI support, and I'm guessing
>>there would be a few other people willing to help out as well.
>>
>>anthony
>
>I know nothing about this, as I've used only Xboard/WinBoard since I started PM.
>Is there any Xboard-equivalent UCI interface on Linux or other platforms?

Jose is written in Java, so it runs on everything.  It's really nice, highly
recommended.

http://jose-chess.sourceforge.net/




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.