Author: Dan Honeycutt
Date: 12:01:33 03/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 09, 2005 at 11:33:01, Heinz van Kempen wrote: >Hi :-), > >principal variations and node count were mainly similar but not always. > >Anyway I made the same test with SOS 5 and here PV, node counts and final moves >were much different in many cases and it could be seen that SOS is a totally >different engine. As I said, this would not have been proof enough and I would >have extended the test, if not others seem to have better proofs here. So I >prefer to waste not more time with this engine. There are enough other >interesting ones. > >Best Regards >Heinz Hi Heinz: Who are these others who have better proof? You are the only person (so far) in this thread who offers any evidence. Best Dan H.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.