Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 12:31:48 03/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 09, 2005 at 15:20:30, Roman Hartmann wrote: >Hello, >well, I have to confess I never heard of Toga before but after having read all >the messages in this thread here it seems that the main 'prove' Toga being a >clone is that Toga prefers the same moves as Fruit in a lot of positions. But >that isn't exactly proof that this engines in fact _is_ a clone. >I guess it would be better to decompile the engine first and compare some of the >extracted routines (search, eval) with the ones from Fruit (or crafty? ...) in >order to be on the safe side with such a claim. Choosing the same moves is very poor evidence. If you take the WAC test and feed it to top engines, all of them will choose the same moves with at least 95% agreement. Usually, internal examination of the binary is required.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.