Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 12:52:29 03/09/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 09, 2005 at 13:16:35, Peter Schäfer wrote: >* UCI's "stateless" approach causes some headaches to engine authors > and is usually cirumvented by transmitting large move lists all the time > (wouldn't call that clean...) How is this circumventing?? You are making no sense at all. If you make a stateless protocol, you need the move list. I think thats about 100000 better and easier to work with than the xboard mess. The biggest problem is that some people didn't figure out how to do learning properly (their problem), and as a result, the protocol was changed (stupid since it's now everybodies problem). -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.