Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is it time for the Winboard Protocol to go the way of the Dodo?

Author: Steve Coladonato

Date: 05:49:38 03/10/05

Go up one level in this thread


On March 09, 2005 at 12:13:26, Anthony Cozzie wrote:

>After the post on how Daniel Mehrmann is still working on XBoard/Winboard, I
>immediately starting thinking of ways to waste his time.  My question is: Does
>Winboard really have any advantages over UCI any more?
>
>The Anthony WB/UCI comparison:
>
>+UCI:
>
>Interface is cleaner & easier to implement, not being based on the crappy GNU
>chess protocol.
>
>Supports Multiple PVs, refutations, etc.
>
>Graphical configuration of engines.
>
>+WinBoard:
>
>Can operate in text mode.
>
>And this comparison is (obviously) quite favorable to UCI, although I may have
>missed things.  Anyway, I'd be willing to help Daniel out over the next few
>weeks if it meant a new version of Xboard with UCI support, and I'm guessing
>there would be a few other people willing to help out as well.
>
>anthony


The equivalent of winboard for Unix/Linux is Xboard.  What is the equivalent for
UCI on Unix/Linux?

Steve



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.