Author: Mark Young
Date: 12:07:55 03/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 10, 2005 at 15:03:46, Gabor Szots wrote: >>>I think Kasparov might not have blown the point if conditions had been >>>different. He knew he was going to be the winner already before the game >>>started. >> >>So you are saying Kasparov lost not because of a blunder...but because he did >>not care if he lost, so he blunderded.....:) > >I am saying that the blunder may have been caused by simple carelessness, in a >situation where overall victory was not in danger. If you are saying losing $15,000 means nothing to Kasparov. And losing first outright means nothing to Kasparov. And losing in general means nothing to Kasparov....then I agree. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.