Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is it time for the Winboard Protocol to go the way of the Dodo?

Author: Frank Phillips

Date: 13:36:30 03/10/05

Go up one level in this thread


On March 10, 2005 at 09:24:14, Andrew Williams wrote:

>On March 10, 2005 at 08:29:02, Vasik Rajlich wrote:
>
>>On March 09, 2005 at 12:13:26, Anthony Cozzie wrote:
>>
>>>After the post on how Daniel Mehrmann is still working on XBoard/Winboard, I
>>>immediately starting thinking of ways to waste his time.  My question is: Does
>>>Winboard really have any advantages over UCI any more?
>>>
>>>The Anthony WB/UCI comparison:
>>>
>>>+UCI:
>>>
>>>Interface is cleaner & easier to implement, not being based on the crappy GNU
>>>chess protocol.
>>>
>>>Supports Multiple PVs, refutations, etc.
>>>
>>>Graphical configuration of engines.
>>>
>>>+WinBoard:
>>>
>>>Can operate in text mode.
>>>
>>>And this comparison is (obviously) quite favorable to UCI, although I may have
>>>missed things.  Anyway, I'd be willing to help Daniel out over the next few
>>>weeks if it meant a new version of Xboard with UCI support, and I'm guessing
>>>there would be a few other people willing to help out as well.
>>>
>>>anthony
>>
>>The current situation is quite ok - every author implements the protocol he
>>prefers, and adapters exist to make sure that every engine runs in every GUI.
>>(Except Fritz & Junior -- gggrrrr :)).
>>
>>Personally, I'm quite sure that UCI support requires less code and less of a
>>mess in your engine - but it's really a minor issue. It was quite easy for me to
>>decide for UCI.
>>
>>As for GUIs - if you haven't already done so, I'd suggest you at least try the
>>professional GUIs. I doubt it's worth it to try to get winboard caught up ..
>>
>>Vas
>
>Lots of people develop on Linux. I'm not going to suddenly start using Windows
>to do chess programming when I use Linux for everything else.
>
>Andrew

I would like to second that.

It is depressing if the suggestion is that all (hobby) chess programmers should
have to agree to the MS licence and fund their 'business' tactics - or write
their own GUI.

Frank





This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.