Author: James Robertson
Date: 08:35:55 01/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 1999 at 09:11:28, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On January 30, 1999 at 06:52:13, Reynolds Takata wrote: > >>CM6000 is better than CM5500, but is it better than CM5555(settings)? I'm not >>sure it is. >Yes it is 40/2h. It is our intention to include CM6000 on our list. >We use 16mb hash and CM6000.obk. >Mr de Koning told us that 16mb should be more than enough, because CM6000 is a >very slow program. He also recommended the original settings. 32mb could make >the program slightly slower. For shorter time-controls he recommended smaller >hash-tables. > >Greetings Bertil! ... I don't understand. Why would larger hash tables be bad for a program? James
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.