Author: Pallav Nawani
Date: 19:36:11 03/10/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 10, 2005 at 17:51:04, rait wrote: >On March 10, 2005 at 16:45:04, mikejfitch wrote: > >>On March 10, 2005 at 16:25:52, Eduard Nemeth wrote: >> >>>XXII SuperGM 2005 >>> >>>1 Topalov,V 2757 +93 ** ½1 0½ ½½ 1½ ½1 11 8.0/12 43.50 >>>2 Kasparov,G 2804 +38 ½0 ** ½½ ½½ 11 ½1 11 8.0/12 41.50 >>>3 Anand,V 2786 -22 1½ ½½ ** ½½ ½0 ½1 ½½ 6.5/12 >>>4 Leko,P 2749 -7 ½½ ½½ ½½ ** ½½ ½½ ½½ 6.0/12 >>>5 Adams,Mi 2741 -27 0½ 00 ½1 ½½ ** ½½ 1½ 5.5/12 >>>6 Kasimdzhanov,R 2678 -35 ½0 ½0 ½0 ½½ ½½ ** ½0 4.0/12 24.75 >>>7 Vallejo Pons,F 2686 -44 00 00 ½½ ½½ 0½ ½1 ** 4.0/12 21.25 >>> >>>Average elo: 2743 <=> Category: 20 >>>gm = 3.96 m = 1.56 >>> >>> >>>That is real curious that the Nr. 1 in the Ranking, is not the winner! :-)) >>> >>>Anyway my Congrats to Topalov. He played the best Chess + Fightings to end! >> >>I totally agree. >> >>The first tiebreak criterium Linares used ((( SUCKS ))) >>First tiebreak criterium should ALWAYS be personal score, then if still tied, >>how many black wins, etc.etc. >>Topalov got robbed. :-( > >Kasparov good have lost because hes retairment was in hes mind throw the game . >And of curse he knew tie-break rules and that hes going to win tourney anyway . Who knows why he lost, but its an good excuse...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.