Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:34:39 03/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2005 at 02:25:01, Mike Byrne wrote: >kqrkq vs kqkqr -- why do we need both -- if we have wtm and btm, isn't this >redundant or am I missing something here ? > where do you see a kqkqr table? All the fives are kxxkx, no kxkxx tables exist that I know of... >Thanks, > >Michael > >btw, I got sidetracked on making a very compatible 32 bit Crafty 19.19 for non >SSE AMD processors tonight -- will do it tomorrow night ... > >Tonight I was working on compiling a Opteron specific, SMP enabled tbgen.exe. > >It generates all 3 and 4 man ETGB in 11:00 minutes flat on a dual Opteron >running at 2.0 Ghz. > >Will let you know tommorrow how long the 5 man set take - but my question above >puzzles me. I believe if you both wtm and btm sides, you do not need both kqrkq >and kqkqr and there are other combinations like that too ...but if somebody >could explain , that would be great. > >best, > >Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.