Author: John Merlino
Date: 08:29:32 03/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2005 at 07:19:46, Mike Byrne wrote: >On March 11, 2005 at 05:16:40, Dieter Buerssner wrote: > >>On March 11, 2005 at 02:25:01, Mike Byrne wrote: >> >>>kqrkq vs kqkqr -- why do we need both -- if we have wtm and btm, isn't this >>>redundant or am I missing something here ? >> >>There is no kqkqr for Nalimov TBs. It would indeed be redundant. >> >>Regards, >>Dieter > >ok thanks, I asked because there is in Chessmaster EDGB and it's listed under >the MAKEALL5.BAT as well as at here >http://www.aarontay.per.sg/Winboard/egtb.html, I borrowed the MAKEALL5,BAT >script from Chessmaster to use for making the Nalimov EGTB (appropriately >modified). It appears that on a dual Opteron . running a smp enabled 64 bit >verison of TBGEN.EXE might be able to make all 3,4,and 5 man Nalimov EGTB's in a >single day. >0 >I will know by tonight. Here's what it says in FEG.TXT (which I assume you also have access to) in reference to differences between currently available formats. ----------- Nalimov's format has KxyKz and KzKxy merged. Eg in KRBKQ the wins for White (KRB) are stored as well as the losses for White. In Thompson's and De Koning's White can only win or not win. ----------- jm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.