Author: Günther Simon
Date: 09:00:26 03/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 10, 2005 at 18:38:39, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >On March 10, 2005 at 08:46:29, Michael Yee wrote: > >>From reading the responses in this thread, it seems like it's possible to do >>nearly everything you want in both protocols, although some things are more easy >>in one than the other (for the programmer or for the user). > >Yes. Therefore, I think, a 3rd protocol is not really needed. > >>But since there seem to be only a few quirks of WB2 that people would like to >>change/enhance, maybe we should just bite the bullet and do it?! > >If, you really need to go ahead, and implement it, in a GUI that runs under many >OS. Perhaps Windows, Linux, Mac, PocketPC, phones. > >>Some of the desired features are: >> >>- standardized PV > >Of course. But don't forget even more basic things: Standardized sign of score >(in WB we now have the unfortunate situation, that some engines show score from >white side, some from side to move). I want to disagree slightly: In WB we have around 270 programs at least able to show score from their POV and only 3 or 4 which can only show score from Whites POV, one of them is Crafty ;) Regards, Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.