Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 10:02:54 03/11/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 11, 2005 at 11:37:31, pavel wrote: >On March 11, 2005 at 02:25:01, Mike Byrne wrote: > >>kqrkq vs kqkqr -- why do we need both -- if we have wtm and btm, isn't this >>redundant or am I missing something here ? >> >>Thanks, >> >>Michael >> >>btw, I got sidetracked on making a very compatible 32 bit Crafty 19.19 for non >>SSE AMD processors tonight -- will do it tomorrow night ... >> >>Tonight I was working on compiling a Opteron specific, SMP enabled tbgen.exe. >> >>It generates all 3 and 4 man ETGB in 11:00 minutes flat on a dual Opteron >>running at 2.0 Ghz. >> >>Will let you know tommorrow how long the 5 man set take - but my question above >>puzzles me. I believe if you both wtm and btm sides, you do not need both kqrkq >>and kqkqr and there are other combinations like that too ...but if somebody >>could explain , that would be great. >> >>best, >> >>Michael > >Hi mike, >how much memory does your machine have? I might need a favor with >memory-extensive chess related work. Aparently my 760mb ddr srdam is not enough >for this job. > >pavs I have 1 gig with another gig on the way. Win Xp 64 bit OS eats up nearly ~200Mb , so I gig does not really cut it for me with that OS. Ram is cheap now, I see some 1 gig sticks going for about $100.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.