Author: Pallav Nawani
Date: 10:35:45 03/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 15, 2005 at 03:53:02, odell jones wrote:
>On March 14, 2005 at 13:52:06, John Merlino wrote:
>
>>On March 14, 2005 at 07:25:44, odell jones wrote:
>>
>>>The below game i should have won, I kind of got bored with the ease that I got
>>>such a great position. The game is against RebelXP dos running on XP2400. Time
>>>control was 40 moves in 1 hr.
>>>
>>>
>>>[Event "?"]
>>>[Site "?"]
>>>[Date "2005.03.09"]
>>>[Round "?"]
>>>[White
>>>[Black "*rebelXP"]
>>>[Result "0-1"]
>>>[ECO "C45"]
>>>[PlyCount "102"]
>>>[EventDate "2005.??.??"]
>>>
>>>1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. d4 exd4 4. Nxd4 Bc5 5. Nb3 Bb6 6. Nc3 d6 7. a4 a6 8. g3
>>>Nf6 9. Bg2 Bg4 10. Ne2 Ne5 11. O-O Nf3+ 12. Bxf3 Bxf3 13. Bg5 O-O 14. Nd2 Bg4
>>>15. Kg2 Qd7 16. Bxf6 Bh3+ 17. Kg1 Bxf1 18. Nxf1 gxf6 19. Nf4 c6 20. Qh5 Qe7 21.
>>>Nd2 Qe5 22. Qf3 d5 23. Nh5 f5 24. exf5 Kh8 25. a5 Bc7 26. f6 Qxb2 27. Ra4 Qxc2
>>>28. Rh4 Qxd2 29. Qf5 Rfe8 30. Ng7 h6 31. Nxe8 Rxe8 32. Qd7 Rg8 33. Qxc7 Qg5 34.
>>>Rf4 Qh5 35. Qxb7 c5 36. Qxa6 Qe5 37. Rf3 c4 38. Qc6 Qe1+ 39. Kg2 Rd8 40. Qc7
>>>Qe8 41. Re3 Qg8 42. Re7 Rc8 43. Qf4 c3 44. Qxh6+ Qh7 45. Qc1 Qg6 46. Re5 Qxf6
>>>47. Rh5+ Kg7 48. Rxd5 Qc6 49. Qg5+ Kf8 50. Kg1 Qxd5 51. Qxd5 c2 {White resigns}
>>>0-1
>>
>>Are you saying that you are winning in this position?
>>
>>[D]r4r1k/1pb2p1p/p1p2P2/P2p1Q1N/7R/6P1/3q1P1P/6K1 b - - 0 29
>>
>>PD may have blundered with 29...Rfe8. Here's what CM9_R1 on an AMD 2500 says:
>>
>>Time Depth Score Positions Moves
>>0:00 1/3 -8.50 8708 29...Qe1+ 30.Kg2 h6 31.Ng7 Qc1
>> 32.Qd7
>>0:00 1/3 -8.75 11690 29...Rfd8 30.Kg2 Bxa5 31.Nf4
>>0:00 1/3 -9.05 16386 29...Rfe8 30.Kg2 Re2 31.Ng7
>>0:00 1/4 -7.86 20531 29...Rfe8 30.Ng7 Re1+ 31.Kg2 h6
>> 32.Qd7 Bxa5 33.Qxf7
>>0:00 1/4 -8.67 24508 29...Rfd8 30.Ng7 h6 31.Qb1 Bxa5
>> 32.Qxb7 Qd1+ 33.Kg2
>>0:00 1/4 -8.83 28672 29...h6 30.Qb1 Rab8 31.Rg4 Bxa5
>>0:01 1/5 -8.85 55646 29...h6 30.Qb1 Rae8 31.Qxb7 Qe1+
>> 32.Kg2 Re2
>>0:03 1/5 -9.07 76072 29...Rfe8 30.Ng7 Re1+ 31.Kg2 h6
>> 32.Qh3 Kh7 33.Nf5
>>0:04 1/6 -6.77 106876 29...Rfe8 30.Ng7 h6 31.Nxe8 Rxe8
>> 32.Qh3 Kh7 33.Qf5+ Kg8
>>0:06 1/6 -8.93 211267 29...h6 30.Kg2 Qxa5 31.Qg4 Rg8
>> 32.Qd7 Raf8 33.Qe7
>>0:06 1/7 -8.78 285083 29...h6 30.Kg2 Rae8 31.Qg4 Qg5
>> 32.Qd7 Rg8 33.Ng7
>>0:08 1/8 -8.79 815664 29...h6 30.Kg2 Rad8 31.Qb1 Rd7
>> 32.Rb4 Bxa5 33.Rxb7 Rxb7 34.Qxb7
>>0:12 1/9 -8.50 1749156 29...h6 30.Ng7 Bd8 31.Kg2 Rg8 32.Qe5
>> Bxa5 33.Nf5 Rge8
>>0:21 1/10 -8.40 4198485 29...h6 30.Kg2 Rae8 31.Qg4 Qg5
>> 32.Qd7 Rc8 33.Qe7 Rg8 34.Ng7 c5
>> 35.Qxf7 Bxa5
>>0:47 1/11 -8.07 11522582 29...h6 30.Ng7 Bd8 31.Kg2 Qc1 32.Nh5
>> Bc7 33.Rb4 Ra7 34.Rb1 Qc4
>>1:52 1/12 -7.92 29853707 29...h6 30.Ng7 Bd8 31.Qe5 Bxa5
>> 32.Qh5 Qe1+ 33.Kg2 Bd2 34.Nf5 Qc1
>> 35.Nd6 Kh7 36.Qf5+ Kg8 37.Nxb7
>>
>>jm
>
>
>
> mOST DEFINITELY IF YOU LET CHESSMASTER THINK LONGER YOU WILL SEE THAT ALL
>VARIATIONS LEAD TO A LOST
Perhaps you would like to give *one* such variation?
Pallav
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.