Author: Richard A. Fowell (fowell@netcom.com)
Date: 23:16:25 01/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 29, 1999 at 19:29:09, Bertil Eklund wrote: >On January 29, 1999 at 13:35:24, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On January 29, 1999 at 12:50:46, Bertil Eklund wrote: >> >>>I choosed a fixed depth and played a move out of book i.e. 1.h2-h4 and compared >>>the times. But you are right the difference between P90 and P200MMX is about >>>75 elo. The hash-tables has increased about 4 times I guess this could give 10 >>>-20 points. So the cpu difference could be about 60 elo. >> >>I checked again the difference P200MMX/P90 and I have the following: >> >>Cm5K 2.87x >>Rebel 9 3.07x >>Genius 5 2.94x >>Hiarcs 6 3.03x >>Mchess 6 2.62x >> >>Average = 2.9 >> >First of all very much thank you for your interesting tournaments! > >As you know SSDF are going to upgrade in the near future and we have to take a >decision in march or so. Do you have any figures on the speed increase for >programs on the P2-400 vs P200MMX. Do you or others have any proposal for what >to choose (best for money). We can´t afford xeons or Kryotech-AMDs or a fragile >overclocked celeron. The P3-500 looks good but is rather expensive. What about >the new AMD. I hope someone can publish some tests with the new AMD if it is >better than Intel I think we could choose AMD. I hope we can have some facts in >this case before a decision in early march. > >Bertil > > > > >>Enrique >> >>>Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.