Author: Lance Perkins
Date: 17:15:08 03/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
I think the eval values should just be numbers and some pre-defined ID's for special eval results (like mate). It should be the job of the GUI to translate this to a human-recognizable form, which can be translated words or a graphical icon or bitmap. >Okay, I agree that the core requirements/scenarios should be articulated as part >of the spec. I don't think we can totally get around having displayable items as >part of the protocol, though, since they could be an essential part of some >scenario (e.g., human user wants to get description of static eval in "words"). > >Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.