Author: William Penn
Date: 04:49:18 03/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 17, 2005 at 07:32:57, Helmut Conrady wrote: >On March 17, 2005 at 04:42:40, emerson tan wrote: > >>Does shredder 9 stil have the same problem of showing weird variation in its >>analysis? Shreddeer 8,7 and 6 have that kind of a problem and it seems that only >>the first move is reliable > >It´s much better than before. > > >Helmut Yes, I agree, it's much better. But I still see an occasional blunder at the end of analyses, so it should probably be concatenated by one more half-move. In other words, the very last move in analyses may be poor, but everything prior is probably reasonable. WP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.