Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To Fabien Letouzey - about Toga

Author: Thomas Gaksch

Date: 11:05:18 03/17/05

Go up one level in this thread


On March 17, 2005 at 13:13:23, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On March 17, 2005 at 03:22:06, Gabor Szots wrote:
>
>>Do you agree that after giving you due credit Toga's "author" can claim that
>>"his" engine is his own intellectual product and can be called a new engine?
>
>Let me say it plainly:
>
>Toga II is fruit.
>
>There are a few tiny tweaks.
>
>If there was ever a model for the definition of a clone, it should say:
>"See Toga II"

you are absolutely right. i have never said anything else. i am very frustrated
that everybody is criticising me. i made a big mistake. thats true. but i can´t
turn back the time. i only could apologize me for my exorbitancy (i hope it is
the right word).

what is bad on it, that the little changes seems to improve the playing
strength. why shouldn´t it be tested. are not all open sources projects clones?
i dont know.

thomas
a frustrated "co-author" or user of open source software



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.