Author: Thomas Gaksch
Date: 11:24:13 03/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 17, 2005 at 13:40:41, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >After reading your post I'm really sceptical if Toga II is that much an >improvement over Fruit2. >The differences are minimal, a lot of what your diff shows are not even real >differences at all. >Aparently a lazy eval was implemented, which could give some speed increase >which already would explain why Toga performs better in 5' games. > >I'm curious to see how much differene between the engines is in 40 moves in 120 >min games. > >regards >andy i agree, that would be very interessting. i also have never tested it. and again. i have never said that toga ist stronger than fruit!! i only tried some minor changes and tested this changes and noticed that these changes seemed to increase the playing strenght a little bit. further test from other persons seem to confirm it. but i have another question. is in chess programming the quantity of changed code a proof of the playing strength? i also have never said that i have invented something new in the enhancements. it is all well known. but it seem to work with fruit very well please don´t discuss anymore. toga is not worth to discuss about it. i think everybody has his own arguments. and no argument is wrong. you can see it from to sides. bye thomas
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.