Author: Gabor Szots
Date: 11:25:46 03/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 17, 2005 at 13:07:11, Dann Corbit wrote: >On March 17, 2005 at 04:31:58, Gabor Szots wrote: > >>On March 17, 2005 at 04:26:45, Fabien Letouzey wrote: >> >>>On March 17, 2005 at 03:22:06, Gabor Szots wrote: >>> >>>>Do you agree that after giving you due credit Toga's "author" can claim that >>>>"his" engine is his own intellectual product and can be called a new engine? >>> >>>I will not try to answer moral questions, and can't answer tricky legal ones >>>either (others will). Please feel free to ask technical questions instead (like >>>how much code is shared between the engines). >>> >>>I leave it to every tester whether he should include Toga in his own tournament. >>> I don't see why I would have a say in the matter, Toga is legal. >>> >>>Fabien. >> >>Thanks, Fabien. Now, how much code is shared between the engines? :-) > >Here are all the differences. They are very, very minor. > (code snipped) It looks as though, among others, some king safety recognizer part has been added, which may substantially improve Fruit-Toga's performance. If you take a look at the games Fruit played recently in my tournament (SzG Swiss 2nd division 12th season) you will see how 4 or 5 times Fruit fell victim to a king attack.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.