Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 11:46:02 03/17/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 17, 2005 at 14:24:13, Thomas Gaksch wrote: >On March 17, 2005 at 13:40:41, Andreas Guettinger wrote: > >>After reading your post I'm really sceptical if Toga II is that much an >>improvement over Fruit2. >>The differences are minimal, a lot of what your diff shows are not even real >>differences at all. >>Aparently a lazy eval was implemented, which could give some speed increase >>which already would explain why Toga performs better in 5' games. >> >>I'm curious to see how much differene between the engines is in 40 moves in 120 >>min games. >> >>regards >>andy > >i agree, that would be very interessting. i also have never tested it. >and again. i have never said that toga ist stronger than fruit!! >i only tried some minor changes and tested this changes and noticed that these >changes seemed to increase the playing strenght a little bit. >further test from other persons seem to confirm it. >but i have another question. is in chess programming the quantity of changed >code a proof of the playing strength? i also have never said that i have >invented something new in the enhancements. it is all well known. but it seem to >work with fruit very well > >please don´t discuss anymore. toga is not worth to discuss about it. i think >everybody has his own arguments. and no argument is wrong. you can see it from >to sides. Actually, I think this sort of thing (small changes that lead to apparently big improvement) are the MOST interesting things to discuss. It is like free beer.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.