Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 23:05:32 03/18/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 18, 2005 at 22:06:10, Mike Byrne wrote: >On March 18, 2005 at 21:08:25, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>On March 18, 2005 at 20:35:17, Mike Byrne wrote: >> >>>José posted a one line question -- you respond with a 20+ line response how you >>>do not like his subject heading? >>> >>>A. That is rude. >>> >>>B. Next time, please spare us the gory details - it will be much appreciated. >> >>Hello! >> >>My english is bad, but I will set a short example. >> >>In my opinion was this not a real Subject. >> >>If I write only words like "Fritz 8", tnen says this first nothing, absolutely >>nothing about my intension in my post. (Only if I "klick" the message and read >>it). >> >>Here any example, what ist a possible subject in my opinion (Fritz 8 along is it >>not): >> >>"I have a Quastion to Fritz 8 - please help?" >>"Games with Fritz 8 against S9" >>Is Fritz 8 a good engine?" >>"What do You think about Fritz 8?" >>Fritz 8 need not run on my systen "XX" "?" >> >>I hope Mike, that You undertsand me now and my intension? >> >>But, If I read only "Fritz 8" as a Subject" then I can not know what need me the >>poster say for me or? >> >>This is my opinion! >> >>But: >>Was this right in Your eyes, then "I am sorry" for my impulsive post. >> >>Sorry! >> >>Eduard > >You apoligize and I think that goes a a long way to mend fences. Sincere >apologies are always good. We all make mistakes and perhaps communicate things >in a way that was unintended. It's human nature. > >I think you're English is very good.. I understood what you meant - that is, a >more descriptive subject heading wouyld be appreciated. That's a fair comment. >It is the delivery and tone in how you conveyed that message. Perhaps a >simple, "It would be helpful to readers if there was a more description in the >subject heading." > >José should feel much better now and understand that this was just a little >unintended mistake in how you conveyed your message. > >I do agree that all posters should post sufficinet information for the other >members to decide whether or not to read a post. We just have to convey that >message in a more friendly tone! > >I felt bad for José because he has not posted very much and he might have felt >unwelcome which is not the case at all. > >Best, > >Michael > Thanks Michael! I do not read every day in CCC Forum, also I hase nit know that José is a new Poster. José You are of course welcome for me. To Micheel any Words: José is new, then is for me Ok if he post also his first posts. But I have seen in last days in another Forum identical sublects that was post from not from a new poster. That was for me then the Problematic. Then I have thinks, that José is also too not a new Poster in CCC. Sorry José and Thanks Michael. Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.