Author: Dieter Buerssner
Date: 09:14:39 03/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 18, 2005 at 17:26:03, Ross Boyd wrote: >However, with TRACE I have become envious of other engine's PV lengths... (it >must be a male thing, ha ha), Look at Fritz some time. I just saw this in this forum: New game, 2b2q2/5r1k/1R5p/1Pp2p2/4pPPb/2N1Q3/4B2P/7K b - - 0 1 Analysis by Deep Fritz 8: 1...fxg4-- ² (0.42) Depth: 7/17 00:00:00 199kN 1...fxg4 2.Rb8 Qd8 3.Qxc5 ² (0.54) Depth: 7/21 00:00:00 319kN 1...Bd8! ² (0.54) Depth: 7/21 00:00:00 334kN [...] 1...Bd8 2.Rb8 Bf6 3.g5 hxg5 4.fxg5 Be5 5.Rb6 Kg7 6.Bh5 Rb7 7.Rg6+ Kh7 8.b6 = (-0.21) Depth: 12/27 00:00:05 11585kN 1...Bd8-- = (0.07) Depth: 13/31 00:00:10 24972kN 1...Bd8 2.Rb8 Bf6 3.g5 hxg5 4.fxg5 Be5 5.Ra8 Qh8 6.Bh5 Rf8 7.Bf7 = (0.09) Depth: 13/37 00:00:12 29688kN 1...Bd8-- ² (0.37) Depth: 14/34 00:00:43 108070kN 1...Bd8 2.Rb8 Bb7 3.Bc4 Rg7 4.Be6 Kh8 5.gxf5 Qd6 6.f6 Qxb8 7.fxg7+ Kxg7 8.Bf5 Bf6 9.Bxe4 Bd4 10.Qg3+ 1...Qg7-- ± (0.72) Depth: 15/36 00:05:01 757000kN 1...Qg7 2.Qh3 Bd8 3.Rb8 Bb7 4.Qh5 Bb6 5.Rxb7 Rxb7 6.Qxf5+ Qg6 7.Kg1 Qxf5 ± (0.75) Depth: 15/68 00:05:38 851760kN 1...Qd8! ± (0.74) Depth: 15/68 00:06:00 910521kN 1...Qd8! ² (0.59) Depth: 15/68 00:06:15 949323kN 1...Qd8! ² (0.27) Depth: 15/68 00:06:53 1044045kN 1...Qd8-- ² (0.55) Depth: 16/44 00:10:09 1541616kN 1...Qd8 2.Qxc5 Qd2 ² (0.55) Depth: 16/67 00:11:54 1794561kN, tb=2 1...Qd8-- ± (0.84) Depth: 17/43 00:28:14 4268307kN, tb=2 1...Qd8 2.Qxc5 Qd2 ± (0.84) Depth: 17/69 00:32:05 4852404kN, tb=58 1...Qd8! ² (0.55) Depth: 18/48 01:30:44 13886598kN, tb=69 Fritz gets deeper and deeper (cough) and the PV gets longer. But what happens now, just when it is becoming really interesting, what a dissapointment ... Shall I run to the patent office immediately with my new product PViagra - principal variations long and strong! Cheers, Dieter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.