Author: Mark Young
Date: 10:34:19 03/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 19, 2005 at 10:51:05, eric guttenberg wrote: >I have been following the results of Shredder 9, not just SSDF but >also other results such as those posted by Kurt Utzinger and Harald >Faber, and I am getting the distinct impression that Shredder 9 is >stronger than any of its predecessors (S8, S7.04) except against >Junior 9. Aside from the SSDF result (20.5-19.5 in favor of J9), >Kurt reports 27-23 in favor of S9 and Harald reports 10.5-9.5 in >favor of S9, both close scores. I think S8 and especially S7.04 do >better against J9. Is there a logical explanation for this? The results you site for Junior 9 does not mean Shredder 9 is weaker against Junior 9. The sample is much too small to make such a claim. For example the 27-23 result for Junior 9 against Shredder 9 is statistically almost meaningless. The result is not much better then 50 - 50 that Junior 9 is better then Shredder 9. > >eric
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.