Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 10:32:08 03/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 20, 2005 at 07:23:00, Rafael Andrist wrote: >On March 20, 2005 at 07:05:00, James T. Walker wrote: > >>I assume you are right that the tablebases >>will lead you to a draw when a longer mate may lead to a win without violating >>the 50 move rule > >Ok, then you understand my point. Giving a PV which optimizes DTM is no proof. > >> but how do you find that mate? > >In this case, there is no such mate. I just say that Mike Byrne did not proof I was not providing proof, I left that for you to figure out and I'm happy to see you have ;>) Best, Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.