Author: Richard A. Fowell (fowell@netcom.com)
Date: 23:22:38 01/31/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 1999 at 00:37:19, Matt Frank wrote: >On February 01, 1999 at 00:34:08, Reynolds Takata wrote: > >>Of course if no P450 is available :), I'm sure someone would gladly donate one >>for the event :). > >No doubt, but I have reasons to believe that my config may be stronger! > >Matt Frank Actually, I would expect the PII/450 to be stronger. I've benchmarked a number of machines with HIARCS 7 on my 33-problem, 4 1/2 minutes/problem suite. Your 233 MHz G3 equates to a PII/326, so a PII/450 would be 38% faster. If you believe the 50-70 Elo improvement per doubling, that would make the PII/400 about 23-32 Elo stronger than your setup. However, a G3/400 would be even stronger. I've appended my benchmark data. Richard A. Fowell (fowell@netcom.com) HIARCS 7 - with 64Mb Hash (Mac) or 63Mb Hash (PC) *************************************************** Machine CPU MHz CPU Nodes/second nps/MHz Configuration =================================================================== Mac Yosemite 400 MHz 750 53,413 nps 133.5 Sys 8.5.1, 128Mb RAM, G3 Mac Yosemite 350 MHz 750 47,615 nps 136.0 Sys 8.5.1, 128Mb RAM, G3 Mac PowerBook 300 MHz 750 40,062 nps 133.5 Sys 8.5, 192Mb RAM, G3 Mac ??? 310 MHz 750 38,929 nps 125.6 Sys 8.1, accel. card? Pent II /400 400 MHz PII 38,347 nps 95.9 Win 98 "safe mode" (DOS) Mac iMac 233 MHz 750 30,942 nps 132.8 Sys 8.5.1, 96Mb RAM Mac 7300/180 180 MHz 604e 20,567 nps 114.3 Sys 7.5.5, 80Mb RAM Mac 6100/ 66 66 MHz 601 4,862 nps 73.7 Sys 7.5 , 72Mb RAM
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.