Author: Martin Baumung
Date: 23:05:35 03/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 21, 2005 at 18:18:36, Andreas Guettinger wrote: >On March 21, 2005 at 17:00:25, George Tsavdaris wrote: > >>On March 21, 2005 at 14:11:06, masros tukiran wrote: >> >>>Sorry,if this post is off topic.I have a chess puzzle.Can anyone create a >>>position that match the following condition: >>> >>>1)BLACK move and double-check the WHITE's King, >>>2)WHITE escaped the doublecheck WITHOUT CAPTURING ANY BLACK's PIECE and >>>3)At the same time demasked another line so that now the BLACK King is in check >>>4)And this check is MATE! >>>ALL THIS MUST HAPPEN IN TWO CONSECUTIVE MOVES! >>> >> >>Although i don't understand the below 2 replies (i know they don't have nothing >>to do with your puzzle but i don't understand them generally....), i will give >>my answer: >>I have found many such games with the above conditions(in fact it's easy to find >>thousands......) but of course i will give only 1: >> >>[D]2R5/2b1N3/8/1p2n3/Npk2KR1/1p6/4B3/8 b - - 0 1 >>1...Nd3+ (double check) >>2.Ke3 Mate! > >great! >As far as I'm concerned, the only right solution until now. > >regards >Andy So please tell us what you think is wrong with the two solutions posted below. I have no clue... As far as my solution is concerned, of course that was before the new #1 rule 'white's last move was no check' was added. Pierre's: [D]8/8/8/3B4/4r3/4p3/3P3p/3RK2k b - - 0 1 1...e3xd2++ 2.Kf2# Mine: [D]1Q6/8/Bb6/p1n5/1k1K1R2/p7/8/BR6 b - - 0 1 1...Nc5b3++ 2.Kd4d5# Both comply with all stipulations, don't they? Martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.