Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: This is not positional sac (NT)

Author: Steve Maughan

Date: 08:18:06 03/25/05

Go up one level in this thread

Shredder 9 plays the move without seeing a concrete way of winning back the
material - therefore IMO this *is* a positional sacrifice.  It looks as if there
may be a forced win of material but it's at least 15 ply deep and not a
straightforward line.  How would you define a positional sacrifice?

Steve

• It does look like a positional sac Evgeny Shu 15:13:33 03/25/05
  • Re: It does look like a positional sac Steve Maughan 20:04:24 03/25/05
    • Re: It does look like a positional sac Terry McCracken 22:53:44 03/25/05
      • Re: It does look like a positional sac Robin Smith 12:51:13 03/26/05
        • Re: It does look like a positional sac Terry McCracken 14:06:30 03/26/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.