Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 16:14:52 03/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 26, 2005 at 18:54:05, Steve Maughan wrote: >Terry, > >This will be my last post on the topic > >>You really don't know what you're talking about. > >As a programmer and chess player I do know what I'm talking about. You haven't >substantiated your arguement at all. Your argement is basically I see Nf5 >instantly and it must win material since it opens the g file - therefore it's >tactical. Yet you don't give any concrete lines of play except one vague, >half-baked line. Read all my posts 1800 player! > >>No, I'm a master are you? You don't listen you don't learn. > >The thing I find irritating about your arguement is not your position it's the >way you arragantly argue. All you do is state your position, say it obvious, >ridicule anyone that disagrees, and refuse to provide any other backup evidence >of your position. Enough said. I gave back up info...you don't care! I'll give you a Complete Analysis if you want! You need to learn to listen...it will make you a better programer....I know the difference between a Positional sac a Strategical sac and a Tactical sac, you don't! If I'm arrogant it is what made me the strong player that I am...I'm tired of this stupidity. This is a public forum, I actually tried to explain the concept to you to help you, but you dismissed my help out of hand... Good Day! > >Steve Maughan Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.