Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 23:21:18 03/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 26, 2005 at 10:51:15, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On March 25, 2005 at 17:39:01, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >>On March 24, 2005 at 05:42:48, george wrote: >> >>>Isnt it funny that kaspy resigned chess a week ago ..now that fisher is free??? >>>maybe fisher really will come back to chess and kapsy just did not wanted to >>>face him???? >>>maybe kaspy new that fisher would create more attention then him ...so he just >>>wanted to blow the world away with his resigination and take all the fame of >>>fisher away??? well kaspys news was bad news....fishers news is good news....i >>>like good news )))) >>> >>>just some question... >>>ps: chess IS politics >> >>The names "Fisher" and "chess" go together only in historical contexts. >>Fischer's chances of beating Kasparov would be just as good as yours. >> >> >>> >>>george > > > >Hardly. He would not have good chances, but he would have far better chances >than anyone that posts here I'd bet. He's still a dangerous player, just too >old to compete at the same level he used to play at. Maybe? There are some very stong players here, maybe not too many GM's but I bet there is one or two. I'd have a chance agaist Fischer today even if they're not great...but very low chances against Kasparov..not none. Just as Fischer chances are low but I'd expect the odd win from Fischer. I know something of GM play as I've played that class of player, with mixed results. A title gives you a very good idea of strenght, but there really are many untitled players that are super stong. They of course rarely get credit.. Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.