Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: CM9000 Testing finished !

Author: pavel

Date: 06:55:14 03/27/05

Go up one level in this thread

On March 27, 2005 at 09:17:50, Kurt Utzinger wrote:

>On March 27, 2005 at 08:57:41, Jonas Cohonas wrote:
>
>>>      It's just crazy: so much work but we are still be unable
>>>      to say for sure which is the best setting.
>>
>>Well i am sure any author of a chess program would be excited over a 5% increase
>>in that many games at that TC.
>
>
>      Hi Jonas
>      Sure: but if you "forget" Minotaur 2 and Alliance
>      the difference is smaller than 3 % and this is too
>      less to conclude something I think.
>      Kurt

But how do you compare these personalities with the original TheKing Engine
(CM9)? I don't see CM9 on the list, or am I missing something?

• Re: CM9000 Testing finished ! Kurt Utzinger 08:41:29 03/27/05
• Re: CM9000 Testing finished ! James T. Walker 07:07:32 03/27/05
  • Re: CM9000 Testing finished ! Jason Kent 08:05:43 03/27/05
    • Re: CM9000 Testing finished ! pavel 08:12:48 03/27/05
      • Since there is a demand for the default performance Ray Banks 09:25:03 03/27/05
        • Re: Since there is a demand for the default performance pavel 09:51:14 03/27/05
          • Re: Since there is a demand for the default performance Ray Banks 09:54:12 03/27/05

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.