Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 08:41:29 03/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 27, 2005 at 09:55:14, pavel wrote:
>On March 27, 2005 at 09:17:50, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On March 27, 2005 at 08:57:41, Jonas Cohonas wrote:
>>
>>>> It's just crazy: so much work but we are still be unable
>>>> to say for sure which is the best setting.
>>>
>>>Well i am sure any author of a chess program would be excited over a 5% increase
>>>in that many games at that TC.
>>
>>
>> Hi Jonas
>> Sure: but if you "forget" Minotaur 2 and Alliance
>> the difference is smaller than 3 % and this is too
>> less to conclude something I think.
>> Kurt
>
>But how do you compare these personalities with the original TheKing Engine
>(CM9)? I don't see CM9 on the list, or am I missing something?
There is no doubt that CM9_default is weaker than the
best CM9-settings. The unsatisfactory results of CM9 default
were at the time the main reason to find stronger settings.
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.