Author: Ray Banks
Date: 09:54:12 03/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 27, 2005 at 12:51:14, pavel wrote: >On March 27, 2005 at 12:25:03, Ray Banks wrote: > >>I shall run that now before proceeding on to CM10th testing. > >Thank you. I think it would be interesting. Even if CM9_Default is not strongest >it would definately be interesting to know how much more stronger the other >settings are. A fair estimation. > >I hope when you move on to CM10 you would do the same. Yes, I agree the default is an important benchmark. After all, how do we know for example that Alliance is actually not WORSE than default rather than better ? I'll certainly do the same for CM10th - default will be the very first set of games that I run, to provide the baseline
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.