Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 11:13:44 03/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 27, 2005 at 10:08:00, chandler yergin wrote: >On March 26, 2005 at 17:04:11, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>On March 26, 2005 at 16:08:12, Steve Maughan wrote: >> >>>Terry, >>> >>>>Nf5!..gf gf..Kh8 b6! followed by Rdg1 etc. +- >>> >>>1. Nf5 gxf5 2. gxf5 Kh8 3. b6 Na6 4. Rdg1 Rg8 (holds the bishop) 5. Nd5 Qd8 >>> >>>Also possible is: >>> >>>1. Nf5 gxf5 2. gxf5 Rd8 3. Rdg1 Ne8 >> >>You really don't know what you're talking about. >>> >>>In both lines white should win due to the pressure. I don't believe that >>>Shredder 9 saw all of the tactics that fall out of this position within 2 secs - >>>it played the move for positional reasons and is therefore a positional >>>sacrifice (IMO). There may be a forced tactical line - this just means that it >>>was a good positional sacrifice. >>> >>>OK let's leave it at that. >>> >>>Steve >> >>No, I'm a master are you? You don't listen you don't learn. > >Interesting... Are you a member of any Organized Chess Groups? >Like we have the U.S.C.F here which keeps tabs on and ranks players. >Do you play in Tournaments? >You have to beat Masters over the Board before you can become a Master. >Care to list a few you've beaten? >Thanks.. Instead being a condecending jerk, why don't you inform us of what type of sacrifice was employed, tactical or positional? There are three types really, Positional sac, Strategical sac, and Tactical sac. Thanks...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.