Author: Graham Banks
Date: 03:46:02 03/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 28, 2005 at 06:16:27, Ross Withey wrote: >Hello Graham, >This is interesting but odd -have you any idea why Minotaur should outperform >Minotaur 2? I do not have the original Minotaur settings...can you post them >please (Fritz GUI)? >Thanks! Hi Ross, the settings of Minotaur 2 were perhaps a little extreme whereas the original Minotaur settings were more moderate. In hindsight I actually prefer Minotaur as the knight and bishop have equal value. My experiment with giving the bishop a slightly higher value in Minotaur 2 was not as successful as I'd have liked. Watch out for Apex - it could well threaten! Graham. CM9000 Minotaur (Graham Banks) P=100 (1.0) N=103 (3.1) B=103 (3.1) R=104 (5.2) Q=105 (opp) (9.4) 106 (own) (9.5) cc=105 mob=100 ks=165 (own) 100 (opp) pp=100 (own) 115 (opp) pw=120 (own) 105 (opp) sel=12 avd=0
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.