Author: Jeff Anderson
Date: 17:14:33 02/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 1999 at 10:35:33, Reynolds Takata wrote: >If we did it your way, Hiarcs might lose Whether or not Hiarcs wins or loses the match, would it not be a valuable win for computer chess? Why is everyone so insistent on proving that Hiarcs and other PC programs are GM strength, when they may not be? Just because this specific creature, built to beat one GM, beats that GM, does not mean it is GM strength. Even Fritz5 did great preparation I believe in the GM tournament it one. I think it would be much for a sign of its true strength against humans if it one went and play in a large American open tournament, where the oppoenents are not know until a day, or perhaps hours before the round. Sir Conan Arthur Doyle: It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts. Jeff
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.