Author: Rob Basham
Date: 08:20:49 03/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 29, 2005 at 09:54:47, Eelco de Groot wrote: >Hello everybody, I am having some difficulty interpreting this position. Is >12.Nxe5 the only move? Is White winning regardless? Should I throw away my >latest settings for Pro Deo? > >[D]rnbq1rk1/pp1n1p1p/4p1p1/3pP1NP/1b3P2/1PpB4/P1P3P1/R1BQK2R b KQ - 0 1 > > >I had some slightly conflicting search results in the position I gave in my last >post http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?418597. That only makes it a >more interesting position I think. > >Pro Deo 1.1 Betazoid T6c met [Queen Value = 95] > >01:11:50.6 0,00 13 566269012 Nxe5 fxe5 Qc7 Qe2 >01:30:45.5 0,01 13 721163232 Nc6 hxg6 fxg6 Nxh7 Qe8 Rh6 > > >Pro Deo 1.1 Betazoid T6e2 > >02:29:01.0 0,28 13 1232946950 Nc6 Nxh7 g5 h6 Kh8 Nxf8 Qxf8 >05:42:39.8 0,39 14 -1368052790 Nc6 Nxh7 g5 Qg4 > >S&D 6_7e3 Pro Deo 1.1 surprisingly to the point. I expected many switches not to >be working anymore. But overall this search seems good, in this postion at >least. > > >00:00:00.5 1,88 1 26 gxh5 Bxh7+ Kh8 Qxh5 >00:00:00.5 3,72 1 28 Nc6 >00:00:00.5 3,80 1 48 Qb6 >00:00:00.5 2,82 2 163 Qb6 hxg6 hxg6 >00:00:00.5 2,90 2 242 Bc5 hxg6 hxg6 >00:00:00.6 3,23 2 820 h6 a3 >00:00:00.6 3,44 3 1627 h6 Nf3 gxh5 Rxh5 >00:00:00.6 3,27 4 6174 h6 Nxf7 Kxf7 Qg4 Nxe5 hxg6+ >00:00:00.8 2,85 5 17265 h6 hxg6 hxg5 g7 Kxg7 a3 >00:00:00.8 3,26 5 28615 Be7 hxg6 hxg6 Nf3 Nc5 Bb5 >00:00:01.1 3,31 6 61197 Be7 hxg6 hxg6 Nf3 Nc5 Qe2 Bd7 >00:00:06.4 2,05 7 729200 Be7 Nxh7 Bh4+ Kf1 Kxh7 hxg6+ Kg7 Qh5 >00:00:14.8 2,34 8 1808764 Be7 Nxh7 Bh4+ Kf1 Kxh7 hxg6+ Kg7 gxf7 Nxe5 Qh5 Nxd3 >00:00:18.8 1,57 9 2339553 Be7 Nxh7 Bh4+ Kf1 Kxh7 Qg4 Kg8 Rxh4 g5 >00:00:57.6 0,98 10 7808043 Be7 Nxh7 Bh4+ Kf1 Kxh7 Qg4 Kg8 Rxh4 g5 Ba3 >00:04:50.4 0,46 11 40080820 Be7 hxg6 fxg6 Bxg6 Bxg5 Bxh7+ Kg7 Qh5 Qe7 g3 Nc6 >00:07:36.5 0,71 11 65032803 Nc6 Nxh7 Be7 Kf1 >00:09:25.8 0,87 11 81944119 Nxe5 fxe5 Qc7 Qe2 f6 exf6 >00:17:53.7 0,50 12 161369733 Nxe5 fxe5 Qc7 Qg4 >00:21:28.3 0,58 12 194454123 Nc6 Nxh7 Bc5 Nxf8 Nxf8 hxg6 >01:07:52.3 0,21 13 616796324 Nc6 hxg6 fxg6 Nxh7 Bc5 Bxg6 >01:42:37.6 0,32 13 938572412 Bc5 hxg6 fxg6 Nxh7 Rf7 Ng5 >04:17:13.5 0,06 14 -1940861402 Bc5 hxg6 hxg6 Qg4 > >Assuming this is anywhere near correct than 12.Nxe5, 12.Nc6 and 12.Bc5 all have >chances to draw. If anyone thinks this is wrong, please tell me. > >This is Pro Deo 1.1 Betazoid T8: > >00:00:06.6 1,83 1 26 gxh5 Bxh7+ Kh8 Qxh5 >00:00:06.6 3,71 1 28 Nc6 >00:00:06.6 3,78 1 48 Qb6 >00:00:06.6 2,76 2 194 Qb6 hxg6 hxg6 >00:00:06.6 2,86 2 302 Bc5 hxg6 hxg6 >00:00:06.7 3,14 2 975 h6 a3 >00:00:06.7 3,35 3 1855 h6 Nf3 gxh5 Rxh5 >00:00:06.7 3,14 4 7234 h6 Nxf7 Kxf7 Qg4 g5 fxg5 >00:00:06.8 0,94 5 24379 h6 hxg6 Nxe5 fxe5 hxg5 g7 Kxg7 >00:00:07.0 1,86 5 40058 Bc5 Nxh7 Nxe5 Nxf8 Nxd3+ Qxd3 >00:00:07.0 2,30 5 48036 Qb6 hxg6 hxg6 Qe2 Nc6 Be3 >00:00:07.1 2,34 5 55190 Nc5 hxg6 hxg6 Rh7 Nxd3+ Qxd3 Qxg5 Rg7+ >00:00:07.2 2,44 5 63386 Nc6 Nxh7 Ncxe5 Nxf8 Nxd3+ Qxd3 >00:00:07.4 2,98 5 71112 Be7 hxg6 hxg6 Nf3 Qb6 a4 >00:00:07.9 3,25 6 95267 Be7 hxg6 hxg6 Nf3 Qb6 a3 Nc6 >00:00:10.2 2,32 7 359126 Be7 Nxh7 Bh4+ Kf1 Kxh7 hxg6+ Kg7 gxf7 Nxe5 Qh5 Nxd3 >Rxh4 Nxc1 >00:00:16.2 1,81 8 1014106 Be7 Nxh7 Bh4+ Kf1 Kxh7 hxg6+ Kg7 g3 Nxe5 Rxh4 >00:00:37.4 1,51 9 3491866 Be7 Nxh7 Bh4+ Kf1 Kxh7 Qg4 Kg8 Rxh4 g5 >00:02:05.6 0,39 10 14867230 Be7 hxg6 fxg6 Bxg6 Bxg5 Bxh7+ Kg7 Be3 >00:03:05.6 0,53 10 22904633 Nc6 hxg6 fxg6 Nxh7 Be7 Qg4 Ndxe5 >00:04:52.5 0,79 10 37974723 Nxe5 fxe5 Qc7 Nxh7 Qxe5+ >00:12:22.4 0,00 11 98465292 Nxe5 fxe5 Qc7 Nxh7 Qxe5+ >00:16:05.1 0,39 11 130139504 Nc6 hxg6 fxg6 Nxh7 Qe7 Nxf8 Nxf8 >00:32:53.6 0,03 12 268802395 Nc6 hxg6 fxg6 Nxh7 Ne7 Qg4 > >Mobility at 125, I hope I can get that to work. Also [Pruning = MISC_30] * >extend singular checks idem. This is responsible for including Nxe5 in the >search. Maybe this extension description is not valid anymore but it works. So I >take back the "Grrr" from my last post about 12.Nc6! Just had to report this >before every programmer starts tuning for a version of their own programs that >plays 12.Nxe5 only! > >Ed Schröders game against Rebel 12: > >[Event "Play for fun"] >[Site "Deventer"] >[Date "06.11.2004"] >[Round "?"] >[White "Ed"] >[Black "Rebel 12"] >[Result "1-0"] >[WhiteElo "?"] >[BlackElo "?"] > >1. d4 Nf6 2. f3 d5 3. Nc3 c6 4. e4 e6 5. e5 Nfd7 6. f4 Bb4 7. Nf3 O-O 8. >Bd3 c5 9. Ng5 g6 10. h4 cxd4 11. h5 dxc3 12. b3 Qc7 13. Nxh7 Nxe5 14. fxe5 >Qxe5+ 15. Kf1 Kxh7 16. hxg6+ Kg8 17. g7 Qf6+ 18. Ke1 Qxg7 19. Bh7+ Kh8 >20. Qh5 f5 21. Bg5 Nc6 22. Bxf5+ Kg8 23. Bh7+ Kh8 24. Be4+ Kg8 25. Bh6 >Qg3+ 26. Kd1 dxe4 27. Bg5 Qd6+ 28. Kc1 Qd7 29. Bf6 Qd2+ 30. Kb1 Qe1+ 31. >Rxe1 Rxf6 32. Rh1 Kf8 33. Qh8+ Ke7 34. Rh7+ Rf7 35. a3 Bd6 36. Ka2 e5 37. >Rah1 Nd8 38. R1h6 Bf5 39. Qf6+ Ke8 40. Rh8+ Bf8 41. Qxe5+ Kd7 42. Rf6 Rxf6 >43. Qxf6 Be6 44. Qxf8 * > >Thanks for any comment > Eelco Hi... Fritz8 plays.....Nxe5....in 30 sec. also Ruffian 1.0.1......prefers.....Nxe5.......55 sec. P3-850
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.