Author: Roger Brown
Date: 10:11:51 03/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
> There is no need of posting the games here. > More interested are we in the results of > some hundred games vs non CM10k-settings > to compare with the default settings I have > tested at 40'/40 time control, list below > Please show us such an overview to demonstrate > the strength of your new settings. > Kurt > >(5) The King 3.33 : 410 (+157,=121,-132), 53.0 % > >AnMon 5.30 : 30 (+ 19,= 6,- 5), 73.3 % >Aristarch 4.50 : 30 (+ 12,= 10,- 8), 56.7 % >Chess Tiger 15.0 : 30 (+ 9,= 11,- 10), 48.3 % >Fritz 8 : 30 (+ 9,= 6,- 15), 40.0 % >Hiarcs8 Bareev : 30 (+ 9,= 8,- 13), 43.3 % >Hiarcs 9 : 30 (+ 8,= 14,- 8), 50.0 % >Junior 8 : 30 (+ 7,= 10,- 13), 40.0 % >Little Goliath Revival : 10 (+ 8,= 2,- 0), 90.0 % >List 512 : 30 (+ 10,= 9,- 11), 48.3 % >Pro Deo 1.0 : 30 (+ 12,= 10,- 8), 56.7 % >Pharaon 2.62 : 10 (+ 7,= 3,- 0), 85.0 % >Ruffian 2.1.0 : 30 (+ 10,= 11,- 9), 51.7 % >SOS 4 for Arena : 30 (+ 15,= 7,- 8), 61.7 % >Shredder 8 : 30 (+ 7,= 5,- 18), 31.7 % >Tao 5.6 : 30 (+ 15,= 9,- 6), 65.0 % Hello Kurt, I have some time. What is the speed of your machine? I want to see if it is feasible to run cpmparable matches on my slow 800 mhz artifact. I suspect not though. :-) Later.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.