Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 10:54:35 03/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 29, 2005 at 13:11:51, Roger Brown wrote:
>> There is no need of posting the games here.
>> More interested are we in the results of
>> some hundred games vs non CM10k-settings
>> to compare with the default settings I have
>> tested at 40'/40 time control, list below
>> Please show us such an overview to demonstrate
>> the strength of your new settings.
>> Kurt
>>
>>(5) The King 3.33 : 410 (+157,=121,-132), 53.0 %
>>
>>AnMon 5.30 : 30 (+ 19,= 6,- 5), 73.3 %
>>Aristarch 4.50 : 30 (+ 12,= 10,- 8), 56.7 %
>>Chess Tiger 15.0 : 30 (+ 9,= 11,- 10), 48.3 %
>>Fritz 8 : 30 (+ 9,= 6,- 15), 40.0 %
>>Hiarcs8 Bareev : 30 (+ 9,= 8,- 13), 43.3 %
>>Hiarcs 9 : 30 (+ 8,= 14,- 8), 50.0 %
>>Junior 8 : 30 (+ 7,= 10,- 13), 40.0 %
>>Little Goliath Revival : 10 (+ 8,= 2,- 0), 90.0 %
>>List 512 : 30 (+ 10,= 9,- 11), 48.3 %
>>Pro Deo 1.0 : 30 (+ 12,= 10,- 8), 56.7 %
>>Pharaon 2.62 : 10 (+ 7,= 3,- 0), 85.0 %
>>Ruffian 2.1.0 : 30 (+ 10,= 11,- 9), 51.7 %
>>SOS 4 for Arena : 30 (+ 15,= 7,- 8), 61.7 %
>>Shredder 8 : 30 (+ 7,= 5,- 18), 31.7 %
>>Tao 5.6 : 30 (+ 15,= 9,- 6), 65.0 %
>
>
>Hello Kurt,
>
>I have some time. What is the speed of your machine? I want to see if it is
>feasible to run cpmparable matches on my slow 800 mhz artifact. I suspect not
>though.
>
>:-)
>
>Later.
Hello Roger
Test was running on 4 identical Athlons 1.3
details can be seen on our website at
http://www.utzingerk.com/cm10k.htm
Experience show that the hardware used is
not so much important to get more or less
identical results ... so, please start your
machine :-)
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.