Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New cm10k setting

Author: Kurt Utzinger

Date: 10:58:30 03/29/05

Go up one level in this thread


On March 29, 2005 at 13:10:46, Dimitris Poulos wrote:

>On March 29, 2005 at 12:01:13, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On March 29, 2005 at 11:10:28, Dimitris Poulos wrote:
>>
>>>cm10k D1Alos:
>>>
>>>myq=101 mycc=120 opcc=105 mymob=100 opmob=125 myks=140 opks=130 mypp=95 oppp=100
>>>mypw=90 oppw=95 avd=-3 sel=12
>>>
>>>Sorry for not posting any games at the moment. It plays fairly well.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Dimitris
>>
>>
>>      There is no need of posting the games here.
>>      More interested are we in the results of
>>      some hundred games vs non CM10k-settings
>>      to compare with the default settings I have
>>      tested at 40'/40 time control, list below
>>      Please show us such an overview to demonstrate
>>      the strength of your new settings.
>>      Kurt
>>
>>(5) The King 3.33             : 410 (+157,=121,-132), 53.0 %
>>
>>AnMon 5.30                    :  30 (+ 19,=  6,-  5), 73.3 %
>>Aristarch 4.50                :  30 (+ 12,= 10,-  8), 56.7 %
>>Chess Tiger 15.0              :  30 (+  9,= 11,- 10), 48.3 %
>>Fritz 8                       :  30 (+  9,=  6,- 15), 40.0 %
>>Hiarcs8 Bareev                :  30 (+  9,=  8,- 13), 43.3 %
>>Hiarcs 9                      :  30 (+  8,= 14,-  8), 50.0 %
>>Junior 8                      :  30 (+  7,= 10,- 13), 40.0 %
>>Little Goliath Revival        :  10 (+  8,=  2,-  0), 90.0 %
>>List 512                      :  30 (+ 10,=  9,- 11), 48.3 %
>>Pro Deo 1.0                   :  30 (+ 12,= 10,-  8), 56.7 %
>>Pharaon 2.62                  :  10 (+  7,=  3,-  0), 85.0 %
>>Ruffian 2.1.0                 :  30 (+ 10,= 11,-  9), 51.7 %
>>SOS 4 for Arena               :  30 (+ 15,=  7,-  8), 61.7 %
>>Shredder 8                    :  30 (+  7,=  5,- 18), 31.7 %
>>Tao 5.6                       :  30 (+ 15,=  9,-  6), 65.0 %
>
>Sorry I don't have the computational time neather fast hardware for such a test.
>But I agree it is very important that people like you do such tests. Though for
>me it is important too to make a setting I like the game it plays and not the
>strongest in any means(not that I don't go for it). Anyway thanks for the
>comparison methodology you share.


      Hi Dimitris
      Your attempt is another way to have fun with
      a setting that plays interesting chess and
      produces amazing games even if the setting
      may not bring top overall results.
      Kurt



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.