Author: Thomas Mayer
Date: 13:36:03 03/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
Hi Sandro, On March 29, 2005 at 11:22:57, Sandro Necchi wrote: >On March 29, 2005 at 06:58:46, WAEL DEEB wrote: > >>Hi, >>Thank you for your accurate observations.... >>The information that the author didn't use a pgn files for creating his opening >>book is a BIG speculation,as he thinks that we are some kind of idiots or >>something :-( >>The statistics from the saved games results of the pgn are there.... >>Cheers, >>Dr.Wael Deeb > >About statistics: > >if a move has 99% score out of 100 games? Is it good? > >If yes, what about if game 100th was the confutation? that's why I always think about kind of a 2 pass book compiler. After having compiled the hole pgn set it could walk again through the openings and look for refutations -> e.g. when a move scores 75% but one of the opponent moves scores even higher for the other site, the automated compiler should consider this... -> of course this is far away from being perfect, but I think this could help book cookers a bit in there complicate task to optimize a book. Greets, Thomas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.