Author: Evgenii Manev
Date: 03:10:09 03/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On March 29, 2005 at 13:58:30, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On March 29, 2005 at 13:10:46, Dimitris Poulos wrote: > >>On March 29, 2005 at 12:01:13, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On March 29, 2005 at 11:10:28, Dimitris Poulos wrote: >>> >>>>cm10k D1Alos: >>>> >>>>myq=101 mycc=120 opcc=105 mymob=100 opmob=125 myks=140 opks=130 mypp=95 oppp=100 >>>>mypw=90 oppw=95 avd=-3 sel=12 >>>> >>>>Sorry for not posting any games at the moment. It plays fairly well. >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>>Dimitris >>> >>> >>> There is no need of posting the games here. >>> More interested are we in the results of >>> some hundred games vs non CM10k-settings >>> to compare with the default settings I have >>> tested at 40'/40 time control, list below >>> Please show us such an overview to demonstrate >>> the strength of your new settings. >>> Kurt >>> >>>(5) The King 3.33 : 410 (+157,=121,-132), 53.0 % >>> >>>AnMon 5.30 : 30 (+ 19,= 6,- 5), 73.3 % >>>Aristarch 4.50 : 30 (+ 12,= 10,- 8), 56.7 % >>>Chess Tiger 15.0 : 30 (+ 9,= 11,- 10), 48.3 % >>>Fritz 8 : 30 (+ 9,= 6,- 15), 40.0 % >>>Hiarcs8 Bareev : 30 (+ 9,= 8,- 13), 43.3 % >>>Hiarcs 9 : 30 (+ 8,= 14,- 8), 50.0 % >>>Junior 8 : 30 (+ 7,= 10,- 13), 40.0 % >>>Little Goliath Revival : 10 (+ 8,= 2,- 0), 90.0 % >>>List 512 : 30 (+ 10,= 9,- 11), 48.3 % >>>Pro Deo 1.0 : 30 (+ 12,= 10,- 8), 56.7 % >>>Pharaon 2.62 : 10 (+ 7,= 3,- 0), 85.0 % >>>Ruffian 2.1.0 : 30 (+ 10,= 11,- 9), 51.7 % >>>SOS 4 for Arena : 30 (+ 15,= 7,- 8), 61.7 % >>>Shredder 8 : 30 (+ 7,= 5,- 18), 31.7 % >>>Tao 5.6 : 30 (+ 15,= 9,- 6), 65.0 % >> >>Sorry I don't have the computational time neather fast hardware for such a test. >>But I agree it is very important that people like you do such tests. Though for >>me it is important too to make a setting I like the game it plays and not the >>strongest in any means(not that I don't go for it). Anyway thanks for the >>comparison methodology you share. > > > Hi Dimitris > Your attempt is another way to have fun with > a setting that plays interesting chess and > produces amazing games even if the setting > may not bring top overall results. > Kurt yes i agree wiht Dimitris imo it is more important to find settings that play interresting chess than ones attempting to be the best of course tests are necessary - to find the relative strentgh of the engine - but more important to me are the games the engines produced during that test:) regards, Geno
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.